User blog comment:Acupunch/What is an object and WHAT IS NOT?/@comment-26429063-20170411115634

Though I get what you're trying to say by "original characters", the three shows and animators you mentioned are the first, and one of the firsts to make object shows. Of course the characters they made are original. Another point is that they're shows, made for entertainment and profits, not "because they wanted to", or "I was bored", like their fanon communities. For this reasons, most of the, didn't bothered to improve their OCs once they were created. Alexlion05 did improve his character, Marker, but he's one of the most influenced person in the OS community, still.

7 years passed, and the "originality" dies. There's an "original character" of almost every objects. For once, the logos are original, so that kind of countered your own arguments. The logos' copyright problems are in the last paragraph.

Little to no important employees in a big federal company cares about Wikias' contents, so why should they check a Fanon wiki? Yes, they are plagiarism, they are illigal, but since they can't be caught - no one cares. It's irritating to see them everywhere, but "you will be in jail" won't get in anyone head.

I know people who drew good poses, or character designs, like you said, using MS Paint, but yeah, I see your point in this. Also, most of the assets "stolen" are royalty-free, aka in a gold mine for memes, so adding "Credit goes to..." is just the last bit of salt on a meal.

I know what you're trying to say, but you can't get people to stop being irritating with their characters just because the reasons you provided are because you're irritated with them, their designs, etc. We all are.